Rights of the Accused
Reading the following and answer the questions that follow.
When a person is accused of a crime they are entitled to
certain procedural due process rights
outlined in the Bill of Rights and 14th
Amendment. These rights are included
in the 4th, 5th, 6th
and 8th Amendments.
The 4th
Amendment outlines protections against unreasonable
searches and seizures. For the
government to search a person or property it must first have probable cause. A warrant
is usually necessary to search a home or property. If the police search a home or property
without a warrant, if the warrant was based on misleading information, if it
includes misinformation, and/or is executed (carried out) improperly the
evidenced seized using that warrant may be thrown out in court. There are some basic exceptions to the
warrant rule: search incident to arrest
– once a person is placed under arrest the police may search that person;
exigent circumstances – the evidence will disappear if the officer does not go
in and seize it immediately, plain view – the evidence is left out where there
is no expectation of privacy, abandonment – if you don’t claim it they can
search it.
Students have fewer rights when it comes to searches in
schools. Because the school acts in loco parentis – in place of the parent,
and there is a special need to keep order within the educational setting,
school officials have a much broader power to search students. These searches may include a student’s locker
(the locker is school property not the student’s), random searches using drug
and bomb sniffing dogs, drug testing of student athletes, as well as searching
your private property (hand bags, cell phones, ipods, book bags) with
reasonable suspicion. The key case that
established search criteria for schools was New Jersey v. TLO. A young woman was caught smoking in the
bathroom. She was taken to the Assistant
Principal’s office, where he searched her purse and found rolling papers, a
list of names notated with amounts of money owed, and a good deal of
money. The student was suspended. The student contended that the search was
unconstitutional because there was no probable cause; however the Supreme Court
disagreed and upheld the power of the school to search students without a
warrant.
The 5th Amendment is known as the rights of the accused amendment
and provides for protections against self-incrimination
and double jeopardy, as well as the
right to a grand jury in major
federal crimes (some states also use grand juries). Self-incrimination
means that the police cannot require a person to give a confession, nor can
anyone be compelled to take the stand during their own trial. Once a person has been found not guilty and acquitted of the charges that person is free to
go even if new evidence appears that would convict him/her. Only when the jury does not acquit, but instead is hung can a mistrial be
declared and a new trial takes place. Grand jury protection for “infamous
crimes” was included to keep the government from charging a person with a major
crime with little or no evidence. Grand juries are larger than petit juries – grand juries have 23 jurors
in Maryland
and petit juries have 12 (for
criminal cases). The purpose of the grand
jury is to review evidence that
the state has against a defendant and decide if there is enough for the state
to bring charges. Witnesses are
called and evidence is introduced by the state, but this is not a trial of
guilt or innocence. If it appears that
the state has enough evidence to go to trial, then an indictment will be handed
down which provides for formal charges to be brought against a defendant. The final protection in the 5th
amendment is that of due process -- life, liberty and property cannot be taken
away without due process of the law
– the government must follow all the procedures outlined in these amendments
before any natural rights can be taken away.
Miranda v. Arizona is the most important case to define proper
police procedures, because of this case police officers must inform individuals
of their rights before taking any statements that can be used in court.
The 6th
Amendment provides for protections during a trial. All defendants have the right to a jury
trial, but this right may be waived by the accused. Defendants also have the right to counsel,
though defendants may act on their own behalf.
Fair, public and speedy
trial, as well as being able to call
witnesses, and cross examine witnesses is also required by this amendment. Sometimes due to intense media coverage it
can be difficult to ensure a fair trial because most people in the area who
would serve on the jury already know about the case and may be biased. Often the trial will be moved to another
location. The most important 6th
Amendment case was Gideon v. Wainwright.
Gideon was a poor defendant
accused of a petty crime. He could not
afford a lawyer and the state of Florida
refused to grant one because it was not a major offense. The Supreme Court
ruled that all defendants regardless of the crime have the right to counsel (lawyer)
and for those who cannot afford one the state must provide counsel. They
ordered the state of Florida to provide Gideon with three of the best defense
attorneys. He was found not guilty.
The
8th Amendment covers both
the beginning and end of the arrest and trial process. In the 8th amendment there are
protections against excessive fines or
bails – the fine and/or bail must fit the crime. Cruel
or unusual punishment is also prohibited.
Though what is cruel and unusual was not defined in the amendment
causing a great amount of debate over practices such as the death penalty.
Identifying Due
Process Violations
Directions: Read
each statement and decide if it is a violation of Due Process. Write yes if it
is a violation or no if it is not.
1.
_____ You are arrested
and not read your rights before you confess to the crime.
2. _____ A state requires your car to
be inspected once a year.
3. _____ A state eliminates representation
(lawyers) for defendants (people on trial).
4. _____ The government takes your
house to build a school and gives you fair market value.
5. _____ A state forbids a teacher from
practicing without a license.
6. _____ A state requires all children
in school to be vaccinated for chicken pox.
7. _____ A student is suspended from
school without a hearing.
8. _____ A judge denies you a jury
trial even though you ask for one.
9.
_____ The US government interned
Japanese Americans in camps during WWII for national security purposes.
10. _____ The government has been
wiretapping suspected terrorists who are American citizens, without a warrant.
END OF ASSIGNMENT
Applying the Rights of
the Accused : Unit 4B (amendments 4, 5, 6, 8)
Directions: Read
each of the following situations below. Write
the Amendment number and list the right violated for
each question. You do not
need to write in complete sentences. (example:
6th amendment- right to a trial by jury)
1. John
Q. Citizen and his daughter were at home watching television when all of a
sudden two or three police officers broke down their door, ordered everyone
out, and began searching for a suspected criminal.
2.
Susie Q Citizen was arrested and put on trial for car theft. The judge
refused to let her have a lawyer.
3. Jane
and her brother Steve had a party to celebrate the end of school. The noise at
the party got very loud and the police arrested Jane and Steve for disturbing
the peace. At their trial they were sent to prison for a year.
4. Two
women were arrested for shoplifting a purse that cost $75. The judge sentenced
both to ten years in prison.
5. Jack
was being tried for armed robbery. During the course of the trial, the judge
asked Jack to explain exactly where he was at the time of the crime. He refused
to answer the question. The judge held that Jack was in contempt of court.
END OF ASSIGNMENT
Criminal vs. Civil Law
Read the following and answer the questions that follow.
Read the following and answer the questions that follow.
Civil Law can be defined as a dispute between two or more parties, usually
involving contracts (an agreement between two or more parties), property,
family (divorce and child custody) or torts (suing for negligence).
The person filing the suit is known as the plaintiff or complainant,
and the person the suit is filed against is the defendant or respondent. Because the punishment in most civil cases
is money or loss of property, the burden of proof is much lower. A preponderance of the evidence
is all that is needed to find a person liable (at fault,
guilty) in under civil law. This simply means that evidence supports that
the person is responsible for the act.
Most civil law cases are settled out of court through the use of
a mediator who negotiates a settlement between the parties.
Criminal law
involves crimes against the state; these can include both misdemeanors (traffic
tickets, shoplifting and other minor
offenses) or felonies (robbery, arson, murder, drunk driving,
assault and many others that are major
offenses). Under criminal law
the charges are brought by the state that is represented in court by the prosecutor. Charges are brought against a defendant. Because the punishment in criminal cases can
result in the loss of life, liberty or property the burden of proof is much higher than that of a civil case. In a criminal case the
jury (panel of citizens who listen
to a case and decide on a verdict) must unanimously find that the person
is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
– this means that the jury is very sure the person committed the crime. Often times these cases are plead down in
order to save time and money. In a plea bargain a defendant may admit to guilt in exchange for lesser charges or a
reduced sentence. Both Civil and
Criminal Law provide for a jury
trial if the defendant chooses.
Part
I. Directions: Use your knowledge of Criminal & Civil
law to complete the chart.
Criminal
|
VS.
|
Civil
|
Description/Types of Cases
|
||
Who Brings the Case?
|
||
Who is the Case Brought Against?
|
||
What is the Burden of Proof?
|
||
Punishments
|
||
Mostly Resolved How?
|
Part II.
Directions: Read
each item. Check whether it is a civil
or criminal case. In the last
column: if it is a criminal offense
write whether it is a felony or misdemeanor; if it is a civil offense identify
which type: contract, tort, family or
property.
Scenario
|
Civil
|
Criminal
|
Specific Type
|
1.
Someone robbed the 7-11 down the street from your house.
|
|||
2.
Someone was harmed in a motorcycle accident and is suing for
damages.
|
|||
3.
The neighbors are getting a divorce.
|
|||
4.
Your Aunt goes to court to ask for custody of her child.
|
|||
5.
Gets caught selling pirated movies.
|
|||
6.
You slip and fall at the grocery store.
|
|||
7.
A CIA officer commits treason.
|
|||
8.
The builder who you have contracted with fails to build your
house.
|
|||
9.
A driver runs a red light and kills someone.
|
|||
10.
You get a speeding ticket.
|
|||
11.
A student sends harassing and threatening messages to your
girlfriend/boyfriend through the internet.
|
|||
12.
You call in a bomb threat to the school.
|
|||
13.
Some kids in your neighborhood vandalize the park.
|
|||
14.
A friend steals your Xbox and games valued at more than $500.
|
|||
15.
A witness lies on the stand during a trial.
|
Complete the terms, as seen on page 565 of your books
Due Process:
Substantive Due Process:
5th Amendment:
14th amendment :
Describe a court case involving each of the following
terms below (565-567)
• Procedural
Due Process-
• Substantive
Due Process-
• Right
of Privacy-
Terms
• Police
Power: Power to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, and
general welfare.
• Search
Warrant: Court order to give police authority to search a suspect’s house (4th
amendment)
Uses of the Police Power (page 566-568) Complete this
chart in your notebooks
State’s Duty to Protect
|
Examples
|
Health
|
|
Safety
|
|
Morals
|
|
General
welfare
|
Handout: Civil Rights--Please read
The 13th Amendment
Section 1: Involuntary Servitude
• Forced
labor is outlawed under 13th amendment
• Draft,
prison terms, or mandatory community service does not fall under forced labor
Section 2: Racial
discrimination
• Civil
Rights Act of 1866 passed to prevent discrimination based on ethnicity
• Congress
could/did not do much to enforce these laws
• 1968:
Jones v. Mayer made it a crime for businesses and other institutions to
discriminate against persons based on ethnicity
Amendments
• 2nd:
Right to bear arms
• 3rd:
Forbids forced quartering of troops
• 4th:
Prevents writ of assistance (blanket search warrants where British
officials invaded colonists’ private homes looking for smuggled goods)
New Jersey v. TLO
•
Supreme
Court case that ruled public school officials could search student property for
evidence of wrongdoing without probable cause
Miranda v. Arizona
•
Supreme
Court Case that held a person in police custody cannot be questioned unless
told of his rights
•
Hence:
The Miranda Rights
Gideon v. Wainwright
• Gideon
v. Wainwright: (1963), is a landmark
case in United States Supreme Court history. In it the Supreme
Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under
the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to provide counsel
in criminal cases to represent defendants who are unable to afford to pay their
own attorneys. The case extended the identical requirement that had been
explicitly imposed on federal courts under the Fifth
Amendment and Sixth Amendment.
No comments:
Post a Comment